Plural Vote - Plural Vote Privacy Policy
Plural Vote Privacy Policy
Your privacy is important for us.
Posted under PLURAL VOTE
Published 3 years ago
1
Minutes
0
Comments
It is Plural Vote's policy to respect your privacy regarding any information we may collect while operating our website. Accordingly, we have developed this privacy policy in order for you to understand how we collect, use, communicate, disclose and otherwise make use of personal information. We have outlined our privacy policy below.

• We will collect personal information by lawful and fair means and, where appropriate, with the knowledge or consent of the individual concerned.
• Before or at the time of collecting personal information, we will identify the purposes for which information is being collected.
• We will collect and use personal information solely for fulfilling those purposes specified by us and for other ancillary purposes, unless we obtain the consent of the individual concerned or as required by law.
• Personal data should be relevant to the purposes for which it is to be used, and, to the extent necessary for those purposes, should be accurate, complete, and up-to-date.
• We will protect personal information by using reasonable security safeguards against loss or theft, as well as unauthorized access, disclosure, copying, use or modification.
• We will make readily available to customers information about our policies and practices relating to the management of personal information.
• We will only retain personal information for as long as necessary for the fulfilment of those purposes.
• We are committed to conducting our business in accordance with these principles in order to ensure that the confidentiality of personal information is protected and maintained. Plural Vote may change this privacy policy from time to time at Plural Vote's sole discretion.
Written by PLURAL VOTE. This article was last updated on 4/10/2018.
Read onTRENDING
1
FORECAST
Is Trump or Biden winning the race for president?
Our model depends on polls to predict vote outcomes. Past polling error informs our modelling of the uncertainty of our predictions. We model the probabilities using the beta, weibull, and logistic distributions. The Electoral College vote and probability is estimated using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations. With 218 days left, our poll-based statistical model forecasts that Biden has a 68% probability of winning the Electoral College on election day.
CONTINUE READING»
2
FORECAST
Will Democrats or Republicans win control of the Senate?
Our model depends on polls to predict vote outcomes. Past polling error informs our modelling of the uncertainty of our predictions. We model the probabilities using the beta, weibull, and logistic distributions. The Electoral College vote and probability is estimated using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations. With 218 days left, our poll-based statistical model forecasts that Biden has a 68% probability of winning the Electoral College on election day.
CONTINUE READING»
3
2020 ELECTION
Biden is outperforming 2016 in the Sun Belt by 9.6 points as he takes the lead in Texas and Georgia
Compared to 2012, the trend towards the Democrats in the Sun Belt is even more staggering — 10.6 points more for Vice President Biden than President Obama.
CONTINUE READING»
4
2020 ELECTION
New data show Biden making massive inroads with Trump's base, threatening Trump's re-election chance
In the general election, Biden is improving in states with non-college whites to a statistically-significant degree. This demographic shifted to Trump in 2016; a reversal bodes well for Biden. Additionally, Biden has been polling 8.4 points better in the Midwest than Clinton in 2016.
CONTINUE READING»
5
2016 ELECTION
Polls suggest that Biden is picking up some voters that opposed Clinton because of sexism
Biden is gaining more voters in states where women occupy fewer management positions, a proxy metric for sexism. Polls show Biden improving more on Clinton’s 2016 performance in states where women perform worse than men on various metrics of equality. If these metrics are viewed as proxies for sexism, this is broadly consistent with social science research indicating that hostile sexism played a role in Clinton’s loss in 2016.
CONTINUE READING»
More articles